Digital Activism Rancangan Undang – Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual
(Analisis Jaringan Komunikasi terkait isu RUU TPKS di Twitter)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24076/pikma.v5i1.848Keywords:
RUU TPKS, Digital Activism, Communication NetworkAbstract
Cases of sexual violence that appeared continuously in December 2021, increased the discussion on Twitter regarding the issue of the ratification of the Draft Law on the Crime of Sexual Violence.The high level of discussion gave rise to digital activism in the form of encouragement and pressure to ratify the RUU TPKS. But on the other hand, the urgency of sexual violence that emerged during the discussion of the RUU TPKS did not make all parties agree with the digital activism movement to ratify the RUU TPKS. These differences generate debates to form a communication network. The network formed consists of clusters consisting of actors involved in it. This study aims to map the communication network that is formed on the issue of the RUU TPKS, using the keyword "RUU TPKS". The analysis in this network is based on the analysis of Eriyanto's communication network, and strengthened by the level of analysis of Suratnoaji & Arianto, namely the level of content, behavior, and network analysis. This study shows that the discussion of the RUU TPKS increased on December 8, 2021, and was quite volatile until January 18, 2022. The results showed that there were 15,159 vertices, and 33,308 edges formed. An important actor in the RUU TPKS network in controlling the spread of information is @dpr_ri. This is based on the fact that the actor has a high centrality in several aspects of the assessment. The direction of opinion formed in the RUU TPKS network is dominated by positive sentiment, meaning that the public fully supports the ratification of the RUU TPKS. In addition, the cohesiveness of the supporting clusters shows a higher value than the repellent clusters in the network formed.
References
Dewantara, Ramma Wisnu. 2015. “Aktivisme dan Kesukarelawanan dalam Media Sosial Komunitas Kaum Muda Yogyakarta.” 19:40–52.
Dijk, Jan Van. 2006. The Network Society. 2 ed. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Eriyanto. 2014. Analisis Jaringan Komunikasi, Strategi Baru dalam Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Haloho, Rhea Adinda Twanty, Dr. Merry Fridha Tri Palupi, Irmasanthi M.Si, dan M. .. Danadharta, S.Hub.Int. 2021. “PENGARUH DIGITAL ACTIVISM TERHADAP PERILAKU CYBERBULLYING ( STUDI KASUS # UNFOLLOWDAYANA PADA REMAJA RW. 006 DESA BAMBE GRESIK).” 1–8.
Hidayaturrahman, Mohammad, Universitas Wiraraja Sumenep, Yossita Wisman, Universitas Palangka Raya, dan Lorentius Goa. 2020. Teori Sosial Empirik.
Joyce, M. .. 2010. “Digital Activism Decoded: The New Mechanics of Change.” IDEA.
Marc A. Smith, Phd, Ismail Fahmi, dan MSi Dr. catur Suratnoaji. 2021. “Big Data Analysis (Key Success For Future of PR).” Surabaya: Ilmu Komunikasi Upn veteran Jawatimur.
Milani, Elena, Emma Weitkamp, dan Peter Webb. 2020. “The visual vaccine debate on twitter: A social network analysis.” Media and Communication 8(2):364–75. doi: 10.17645/mac.v8i2.2847.
Panji, Aditya. 2015. “Twitter Media Sosial Paling Efektif untuk Gerakan Sosial.” CNN Indonesia. Diambil (https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20150616182515-185-60401/twitter-media-sosial-paling-efektif-untuk-gerakan-sosial).
Siyoto, dan M. Ali Sodik. 2015. Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. 1 ed. diedit oleh Ayup. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suratnoaji, Catur, dan Irwan Dwi Arianto. 2021. Metode Riset Sosial Berbasis Big Data. diedit oleh R. Astikawati dan E. K. Dewi. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Tifa, Foundation. 2017. “Anak Muda & Aktivisme Digital.” in Kelas Muda Digital (KEMUDI). Jakarta: Tifa Foundation.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal PIKMA : Publikasi Ilmu Komunikasi Media Dan Cinema

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.