Beyond Wavering
Post-Colonial Resistance and Norm Contestation in ASEAN’s Response to Myanmar’s Coup
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24076/nsjis.v8i2.2304Keywords:
ASEAN, Myanmar Coup, Norm Contestation, Post-Colonial, SovereigntyAbstract
This study aims to analyze ASEAN's response to the military coup in Myanmar as a form of post-colonial resistance that affects regional norm formation. This study is important because it reveals how collective memories of colonialism shape ASEAN's attitudes towards the concepts of democracy, sovereignty, and intervention, giving rise to the dynamics of norm contestation between the principle of non-intervention and the pressure to protect human rights. The method employed is Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), which is used to explore the discourse construction and ideology underlying ASEAN policies. The theoretical framework adopted includes norm contestation theory which emphasizes that international norms are dynamic and contested, as well as Dipesh Chakrabarty's post-colonial approach, which highlights historical trauma as the foundation of institutional resistance. The results show that ASEAN's cautious stance is not a weakness, but a form of protection of sovereignty and political identity shaped by colonial experiences. This study contributes to the understanding of the interaction between global and local norms in the post-colonial world, enriching the discourse of international relations from the perspective of the Global South.
Downloads
References
Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. Routledge, 7(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.62608/2158-0669.1268
Achmadi, M. R. P. (2025). The Role of ASEAN As Norm Entrepreneurs in The Development of Human Rights Protection Norms in Southeast Asia. Journal of Law and Social Transformation (JLAST), 3(1), 56–64.
African Union. (2009). Decision on the Prevention of Unconstitutional Changes of Government and Strengthening the Capacity of the African Union to Manage such Situations. Doc. Assembly/AU/7(XIII).
Alexandra, L., & Adhikari, M. (2023). The Role of ASEAN in the Myanmar’s Post-Coup Crisis: Breaking the Stalemate? In PeaceRep: The Peace and Conflict Resolution Evidence Platform. https://peacerep.org/publication/the-role-of-asean-in-myanmarpost-coup-crises/
Allard, T. (2021). Southeast Asian leaders to discuss Myanmar with coup leader | Reuters. Reuters.
Anderson, B. (2006). From Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. In Verso (Revised Ed).
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Arifin, S. (2022). Abuse of Human Rights in Myanmar: An Urgent Appeal to Reinterpret the ASEAN Non-Interference Principle. Human Rights in the Global South (HRGS), 1(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.56784/hrgs.v1i2.12
ASEAN. (1967). Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), 7. http://agreement.asean.org/home/index/3.html
ASEAN. (1997, August 8). History - ASEAN | ONE VISION ONE IDENTITY ONE COMMUNITY. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Commemoration of Its 30th Anniversary.
ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights. (2023, September 23). ASEAN’s ‘review and decision’ on Five Point Consensus falls short of what is needed to resolve Myanmar crises, Southeast Asian MPs say - APHR. https://aseanmp.org/publications/post/aseans-review-and-decision-on-five-pointconsensus-falls-short-of-what-is-needed-to-resolve-myanmar-crises-southeast-asianmps-say
ASEAN Sekretariat. (2021). Chairman’s Statement on the ASEAN Leaders’ Meeting: FivePoint Consensus on Myanmar.
Beeson, M., & Bellamy, A. J. (2008). Securing Southeast Asia the politics of security sector reform. In Routledge (6th ed.).
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincialización de Europa (G. Ortne, Sherry B; Dirks, Nicholas B; Eley (ed.)). PRINCETON UNIVERSITY RESS.
Chongkittavorn, K. (2016, March 7). Thanat Khoman - an embodiment of Thai diplomacy. The Nation. https://www.nationthailand.com/perspective/30280926
Connelly, A. (2021, March 1). The coup in Myanmar and the threat to ASEAN centrality. International Institute for Strategic Studies. https://www.iiss.org/onlineanalysis/online-analysis//2021/03/coup-myanmar-asean
Cooley, A. (2015). Countering democratic norms. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0049
Corthay, E. (2016). The ASEAN Doctrine of Non-Interference in Light of the Fundamental Principle of Non-Intervention. Asia-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 17(2).
Creswell, J. W. J. D. C. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Fifth Edition. In SAGE Publications.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237-3
Deitelhoff, N. (2020). What’s in a name? Contestation and backlash against international norms and institutions. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120945906/ASSET/A7067407-1AD7-40DB-
9E8F-3275933A7751/ASSETS/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_1369148120945906-FIG2.JPG
Drajat, G. M. (2022). ASEAN’s Socialization of Myanmar: Perilous Ambivalence, the 2021 Coup and the Way Forward. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 44(3), 453–481. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27193041
Dunst, C. (2021, August 26). The Myanmar Coup as an ASEAN Inflection Point. Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs Article Display
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: the critical study of language. Longman, 425–451. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-017
Gunawan, T. (2024). Between Principles and Actions: ASEAN and Indonesia in Dealing With The Political Crisis In Myanmar. Jurnal Global & Strategis, 18(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.18.1.2024.81-106
Ha, Hoang Thi & Bünte, M. (2023). ASEAN’s Myanmar Crisis: An Unfolding Test of Norms, Leadership and Unity. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 77(3), 201–216.
Hanung, C. D. J., & Arinii, R. (2021). One Vision, Different Responses: An Analysis of ASEAN Member States’ Responses to the Myanmar Coup and Recommendations. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA).
Ianone, Annielo; Konchanan, Vatanya; Wiryawan, B. A. (2024). Regional Integration and The Myanmar Crisis: Navigating the Delicate Balance Between Human Rights and Non-Interference Policy In ASEAN. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial (JIS), 23(1), 1–16.
Indonesia department of foreign affairs. (1997). President Suharto, speech to the People’s Representative Council. In Committee & for the W. of the H. of D. of the R. of Indonesia (Eds.), Diplomatic History of the Republic of Indonesia: From Era to Era (IV A, pp. 93–94). Department of Foreign Affairs Foreign Affairs.
Jones, L. (2012). ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia. In Contemporary Southeast Asia (Vol. 34, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1355/cs34-2i
Lee, J. jee. (2018, December). Colonialism and ASEAN Identity: Inherited “mental barriers” hindering the formation of a collective ASEAN identity. Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia. https://kyotoreview.org/trendsetters/colonialism-asean-identity/#return-note-13882-1
Li, Y., Feng, J., & Zheng, A. (2023). Adaptability of ASEAN States Political Security Norms in the Post Cold War Under a Theory of Social Evolution Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal, 172–184. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4543502
Lin, J. (2021). The Impact of the Myanmar Coup on Regional Security in Southeast Asia. Institute for National Defense and Security Research, 203–214.
Manggala, P. U. (2013). The Mandala Culture of Anarchy: The Pre-Colonial Southeast Asian International Society. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies), 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v1i1.764
Mogashoa, T. (2014). Understanding Critical Discourse Analysis in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 1(7), 104–113. www.arcjournals.org
Molthof, M. (2012). ASEAN and the Principle of Non-Interference. E-International Relations, 1–7. https://www.e-ir.info/2012/02/08/asean-and-the-principle-of-noninterference/
Muhammad, A., & Sahide, A. (2022). Asean’s Response to The Myanmar Military Coup: From Non-Intervention To Responsibility To Protect. Unisci Journal, 59, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-140
Nguyen, T.-A. (2016). Norm or Necessity? The Non-Interference Principle in ASEAN -JournalQuest. Cornell International Affairs Review, 9(1).
Organization of American States. (1991, June 5). AG/RES. 1080 (XXI-O/91). Https://Www.Oas.Org/Juridico/English/Agres1080.Htm.
Peyton, B., Bajjalieh, J., Shalmon, D., Martin, M., & Bonaguro, J. (2021). “Cline Center Coup D’état Project Dataset Codebook”. Cline Center Coup D’état Project Dataset. Cline Center for Advanced Social Research, V.2.0.2(V.2.0.2). https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-9651987
Plunkett, A., & Tansey, O. (2024). Norm waverers and norm enforcement: ASEAN, Myanmar, and the anti-coup norm. Review of International Studies, February 2021, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210524000755
Rahmadian, F., & Hospes, O. (2015). Decolonizing Diplomacy: A Systematic Review of Southeast Asian Countries’ Diplomacy Strategies. Global South Review, 7(1), 54–82.
Saha, P. (2024). Finding an End to the Myanmar Crisis: ASEAN’s Massive Task. Observer Research Foundation, 453.
Saravanamuttu, J. (2025). The Myanmar Crisis: Interrogating the Limits of ASEAN’ s Constructive Engagement and New Pathways to Peace. AEI Insights: An International Journal of Asia-Europe Relations, 10(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22452/AEIINSIGHTS.vol10no1.4.
Severino, C. R. (2006). Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community: Insights from the Former. ISEAS Publishing.
Southgate, L. (2019). ASEAN Resistance to Sovereignty Violation Interests, balancing and the role of the vanguard state. Bristol University Press.
Sulaiman, Y., & Nelson, B. N. (2023). The Military and ASEAN’s Principle of NonInterference. Global Strategies, 18((2)), 475–498.
Tansey, O. (2017). The Fading of the Anti-Coup Norm. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0012
Tene, R. M. M. (2024). ASEAN Five-Point Consensus on Myanmar. RSIS Commentary Series, 106. https://rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/asean-five-point-consensus-onmyanmar/?doing_wp_cron=1744524066.9405860900878906250000
Villanueva, K. H. R., & Manalo, R. G. (2017). ASEAN Consensus: The Intangible Heritage of Southeast Asian Diplomacy. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), 4(January 1984), 88–122.
Wiener, A. (2009). Enacting meaning-in-use: Qualitative research on norms and international relations. Review of International Studies, 35(1), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008377
Wiener, A. (2014). A Theory of Contestation (Issue August 2014). Springer.
Wiener, A. (2017). A Theory of Contestation – A Concise Summary of Its Argument and Concepts.
Yadanar-Aungmin, H. (2021). ASEAN: Conditional Prodder to Myanmar in its Quest for Credibility? Journal of International and Advanced Japanese Studies, 13(March), 95–112.
Yamakage, S. (2017). Evolving ASEAN and Changing Roles of the TAC The Common Utility of ASEAN in the First Decade. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), 4, 39–48.
Yoshimatsu, H. (2023). Meanings, norms, and social constitution: revisiting ASEAN centrality in East Asian regionalism. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 24(4), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109923000257
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Andra Khagum Muhammad, Jusmalia Oktaviani, Anggun Dwi Panorama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
